<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby or Python: Round Two!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endlesslycurious.com/2008/11/14/ruby-or-python-round-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endlesslycurious.com/2008/11/14/ruby-or-python-round-two/</link>
	<description>by Daniel Brown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:27:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jani Hartikainen</title>
		<link>http://www.endlesslycurious.com/2008/11/14/ruby-or-python-round-two/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jani Hartikainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endlesslycurious.com/?p=745#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve come to the same conclusion regarding libraries and that... but that&#039;s probably because Python as a language has been around longer than Ruby.

What comes to public/private type of stuff.. I don&#039;t know if it really matters that you can&#039;t call a private method of some class. If you really wanted to misuse them, you could just modify the code to make it public anyway. Sure, it&#039;s probably easier when you don&#039;t need to modify the source, but in both cases in my opinion it&#039;s just a matter of discipline.

I do find Ruby&#039;s syntax a bit weird, so I&#039;m probably somewhat biased in my opinion of Python being better =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to the same conclusion regarding libraries and that&#8230; but that&#8217;s probably because Python as a language has been around longer than Ruby.</p>
<p>What comes to public/private type of stuff.. I don&#8217;t know if it really matters that you can&#8217;t call a private method of some class. If you really wanted to misuse them, you could just modify the code to make it public anyway. Sure, it&#8217;s probably easier when you don&#8217;t need to modify the source, but in both cases in my opinion it&#8217;s just a matter of discipline.</p>
<p>I do find Ruby&#8217;s syntax a bit weird, so I&#8217;m probably somewhat biased in my opinion of Python being better =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
